Posted by
Bob Sordahl on Sunday, July 26, 2009 3:28:18 PM
Originally posted on 07/26/09 at
ConservativeCompass.com
I'm not an obstructionist on the health care issue. I've felt for a
long time that something needs to be done to make our current system of
care delivery more efficient and less costly. However, I don't
understand how anyone could want to do so at the expense of personal
freedom, or the risk of breaking the financial backbone of this
Country. The Libs once again are exploiting their power in the
administration and Congress to bestow on the "receiving class" yet
another benefit that will make them just that much more dependent upon
Big Government and bigger taxes.
The administration started out talking about "health care" but has
now shifted to a program designed to alter insurance coverage, costs
and companies. Once again to forward their agenda, they have targeted
a bogey man to vilify. President Obama has criticized the insurance
executives "lining their pockets" with outrageous premiums, while
refusing treatment to the most at-risk and needy among us. Worst of
all, these bastards refuse coverage for those with "pre-existing"
conditions. How can anyone be so cruel?
Why do you buy auto
insurance? If you are like the majority of Americans, you do so in
case someone blows a stop sign and T-bones your car, not because the
car is already sitting wrecked in your driveway. Insurance is
something you purchase to protect yourself from the unexpected, not to
cover the costs of problems you already have.
I'm going to say
something really radical here: Insurance is a for-profit business.
The whole premise of insurance is to collect more money in premiums
than is paid out in benefits. This is achieved by utilizing actuarial
information. We know how many drivers of a certain gender and age are
likely to wreck their car. We know how many people of a particular
gender and age are likely to break their arm, catch the flu or get
cancer. Insurance companies make or lose money depending on how much
their customers deviate from the actuarial norms, and they charge a
premium, the amount of which is based on your likelihood of doing so.
That is how they remain in business.
Note to Congress:
For-profit businesses are the economic engine of this Country. They
are the entities that create jobs, pay taxes and make it possible for
their employees to pay taxes and buy products. Without them, you have
nothing but a Government printing press and so much paper. You would
do well to support them rather than figuring out ways to tax them out
of existence or turn them into Government holdings.
There is
so much wrong with the health insurance bill currently rolling through
Congress, it is hard to pare down to individual items, but the
"pre-existing condition" issue is one of the most troubling. It is a
component of both the Democrat and Republican plans, and it blows
actuarial tables out of the water. There is no way an insurance
company can stay in business if they are required by law to issue a
policy to anyone who walks in the door regardless of their state of
health. If putting the evil insurance companies out of business is the
ultimate goal of this legislation, there is no question that will be
the outcome and it will happen in a hurry. At what point have we
decided health insurance should be a non-profit proposition? That will
be the case at the moment this Congress, and by extension the American
people decide that health insurance is a right of every resident of
this Country, and that it is worth adding more trillions of debt to the
backs of our hardworking taxpayers.
If we allow on demand
"insurance" for pre-existing conditions, it is no longer insurance, but
rather an entitlement. Our current government Medicare and Medicaid
programs are riddled with fraud, corruption and are breaking the bank
as it is. Do we really need another staggering entitlement program?
If that is where we allow Congress to go with this legislation, we will
all be forced into the Government program as our private insurance
companies go broke fulfilling the mandate. If you think the Government
can handle such a program for 300 million people, I suggest you visit
your local VA hospital for an afternoon. That is
Government health care in practice and you won't like what you see.
If we want to be compassionate and set up an entitlement for citizens
with terminal conditions, it would be a lot less expensive and
complicated than the disaster that Congress is considering now. Our
current system is not broken and does not need to be gutted.
Improvements can be made without destroying the health care and
insurance system that
almost 90% of Americans are happy with .
In America we have the best health care in the entire world. In spite
of Michael Moore's opinion, that is why world leaders
(and citizens of Canada and England), come here for care. The program
Congress is about to force on us will not raise everyone's health care
to some idyllic level of perfection, but rather lower everyone to
mediocrity and Government inefficiency at incredible expense. Why
would anyone want that kind of change?